Table 3. Evidentiary studies related to diagnostic/therapeutic values of the intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring in spine surgeries

Evidence class1) Year Subject number2) Operation Study design Monitoring modalities Results Reference
Diagnostic value
I 2015 25 Tumorectomy (Intramedullary) Retrospective SSEP/MEP Free-run EMG MINM has 100% sensivity, 91% specificity, 60% PPV, and 100% NPV (using all-or-none warning criteria for MEP). ‘All-or-none’ criteria showed the higher accuracy than ‘>50% decrement of amplitude’ for the prediction of long-term outome. [47]
III 2015 75 Cervical spine surgery Retrospective SSEP/MEP Free-run EMG Five patients showed the loss of MEP during neck positioning. Four of 5 had compete recovery of MEP after repositioning, but one failed to recover resulting in the post-operative neurologic deficit. [55]
II 2014 1,162 Deformity correction Retrospective MEP The new warning criteria (>80% amplitude reduction) yields a very low false-positive rate (0.26%) and PPV of 83.3%. [16]
II 2013 103 Spinal tumor & myelopathy Prospective SSEP/MEP/D-wave D-wave was feasible in 97 cases. A stable D-wave recording correctly predicted good motor outcome in allrecordable cases. The one case which showed the increase of D-wave amplitude during the surgery revealed the improvement of post-operative motor function. [46]
I 2012 175 Deformity correction Retrospective SSEP/MEP MINM sensitivity/specificity; 92.9%/99.4%, MEP alone (warning criteria; >75% reduction of amplitude) ensitivity/specificity; 91.7%/ 98.8%, SSEP alone sensitivity/specificity; 50%/ 95.2%. [45]
I 2007 52 Cervical myelopathy Retrospective SSEP/MEP MEP (warning criteria; >80% reduction of amplitude) sensivity and specificity were 100% and 90% versus 0% and 100% for SSEP. The PPV of MEP was 17% (5 of 6 events were false positive). [3]
I 2007 1,017 Spine surgery Prospective SSEP/MEP Free-run EMG MINM sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 99% respectively with 8 false negatives. Lumbar spine decompression operations accounted for 40% of false positive cases. [56]
III 2006 57 Laminoplasty Prospective MEP No cases showed the decrement of MEP during the surgery, but 3 had post-operative C5 palsy (transient). [57]
I 2004 427 Cervical spine surgery Retrospective SSEP/MEP MEP sensitivity and specificity were 100%, while SSEP were 100% specific but only 25% sensitive. [2]
II 2002 97 Spine surgery Prospective SSEP/MEP The 16 patients revealed the significant signal change during the surgery. Six of 16 patients had new post-operative neurologic deficits while there were no deficits in cases with normal waves during the surgery. [44]
II 1995 51,263 Spine surgery Survey SSEP True negatives ratio was 98%, false negative ratio. 0.13%, true positive ratio. 0.42%, and false positive ratio. 1.5%. [43]
III 1989 20 Cervical spine surgery Retrospective MEP One new postoperative deficit was predicted by the complete loss of MEP, while 5 cases showed transient attenuation of MEP without the post-operative neurologic deficit. (sensitivity 100%; specificity 74%). [42]
III 1984 137 Deformity correction Retrospective SSEP SSEP deterioration were seen in 69 cases. The new post-operative neurologic deficits were obtained in cases of the sustained worsening of both amplitude and latency of waves. [41]
Therapeutic value
III 1988 295 (150/145) Thoracolumbar spine injury Retrospective SSEP The of 145 (6.9%) control group had new post-operative deficits, while one of 150 (0.7%) developed a new deficit in the monitored group. [58]
III 1993 171 (51/120) Decompressive surgery (OPLL) Retrospective SSEP No post-operative deficits occurred in the present case series with SSEP monitoring, which was superior to histrocial control groups. [48]
III 2006 1,445 Cervical spine surgery Retrospective SSEP/MEP Free-run EMG MINM detected post-operative neurologic damage in 2 patients out of 267 alerts. Eight operations were aborted d/t significant EP changes without any new deficits. [59]
III 2006 100 (50/50) Tumorectomy (intramedullary) Retrospective SSEP/MEP/D-wave MINM group had better mean McCormick grade improvement than control group at 3-month follow-up. (+0.28 vs -0.16, p = 0.0016). [23]
III 2010 32 articles Spine surgery Systematic review Very low-level evidence; Intervention itself responding to an INM alert during surgery reduces the rate of the development of neurologic damage. [49]
III 2012 720 Cervical spine surgery Retrospective N/A Only three patients (0.4%) showed a new, transient post-operative neurological deficit. Cost savings was estimated at $1024,754. [51]
III 2013 12,375 Spine surgery Retrospective SSEP/MEP neurogenic MEP, Free-run/Triggered EMG Intraoperative interventions made improvement in 360 alerts out of 406. One patient revealed a new deficitcompared with 14 deficits of which alerts failed to recover after intervention. (MINM reduced the risk of development of neurologic deficit from 3.1% to 0.12%) [50]
II 2014 76 (50/26) Tumorectomy (intramedullary) Retrospective SSEP/MEP The use of INM did not change the result of the rate of gross total resection or the neurologic outcome. [52]
II 2017 101 (41/70) Tumorectomy (IDEM) Retrospective MEP, SSEP There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of new postoperative neurologic deficit between the monitored and unmonitored group (10% vs 14%). [53]
This is applied to according to ‘North American Spine Soceity’ standard [60].
The number within in parestheses indicate ‘the number of patients with INM/the number of patients without INM.’
SSEP: somatosensory evoked potentials; MEP: motor evoked potentials; INM: intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring; MINM: multimodal intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; OPLL: ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament; N/A: not added.