Case Report

Delayed loss of motor evoked potentials during cerebral aneurysm clipping surgery

Jongsuk Choi1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-5401, Sung Un Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4909-5218, Sung Hoon Kim2, Jae Seung Bang2, Kyung Seok Park1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1553-5932
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
2Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
*Corresponding author : Kyung Seok Park, Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam 13620, Korea, Tel: +82-31-787-7466, Fax: +82-31-787-4059, E-mail: kpark78@naver.com

© Copyright 2019 Korean Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jan 31, 2019 ; Revised: Feb 14, 2019 ; Accepted: Mar 08, 2019

Published Online: Apr 30, 2019

ABSTRACT

The surgical outcomes of patients with cerebral aneurysm may be severely impaired by ischemic complications resulting from inadvertent vascular occlusion or compromise. We report a case of delayed loss of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during cerebral aneurysm clipping surgery, in which aneurysm clip rotation after the release of brain retraction might have disrupted blood flow in the branching arteries near the aneurysm. Although an indocyanine green angiogram confirmed the patency of all adjacent vessels after aneurysmal clipping, the loss of MEPs was observed during dural closure. We emphasize that surgeons and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) personnel should not only exercise caution in the clip placement itself, but also be aware of the necessity of continuing IONM until the end of surgery, because major changes may occur even during the non-key portions of surgery.

Keywords: clip rotation; intracranial aneurysm; intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

The surgical outcomes of patients with cerebral aneurysm may be severely impaired by ischemic complications resulting from inadvertent vascular occlusion or compromise [14]. Incorrect placement of the clip may cause incomplete exclusion of the aneurysm or compromise blood flow in the adjacent arteries [1,3,4]. Herein, we report a case in which blood flow insufficiency after the release of the brain retractor was detected through intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) and ischemia was successfully avoided.

Case report

1. Clinical presentation

A 49-year-old man visited our hospital because of an asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysm identified using magnetic resonance angiography. Cerebral catheter angiography revealed a saccular aneurysm at the M1 segment of the right middle cerebral artery (Fig. 1-A). Surgical clipping was performed with IONM.

join-1-1-25-g1
Fig. 1. 3D rotational angiography taken before and after surgical clipping. (A) Preoperative angiogram showing a saccular aneurysm at the M1 segment of the right middle cerebral artery (neck 5.3 mm, height 5.0 mm, width 5.1 mm, and length 6.3 mm). (B) Postoperative angiogram confirming complete obliteration of the aneurysm with preservation of the adjacent vessels.
Download Original Figure
2. Anesthesia

Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol (3.5–4.0 μg/mL) and remifentanil (1.0–3.5 μg/mL) was used. Neuromuscular blockade was applied immediately before intubation (0.5–0.9 mg/kg rocuronium) without a maintenance dose.

3. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs) were monitored during surgery. To obtain SSEPs, we administered square-wave electrical pulses for 0.3 ms at 15 mA for the median nerve and 20 mA for the tibial nerve at a frequency of 2.31 Hz. Recording electrodes were placed at C3’, C4’, Cz’, fifth cervical spine, Erb’s point, and popliteal fossa. In addition, a reference electrode was placed at Fpz. Low- and high-band pass filters were set at 30 and 1,000 Hz, respectively.

TcMEPs were evoked using an electrical stimulator (Xltek Protektor 32 IOM system; Natus Medical Inc, Ontario, Canada). A train of five square-wave stimuli was delivered with an individual pulse duration of 0.05 ms, an inter-stimulus interval of 1–2 ms, an intensity of 250–500 V, a time base of 100 ms, and a 10–1,000-Hz filter. C1 anode and C2 cathode pairs were used for stimulation of the left hemisphere, and the reverse arrangement was used for the right hemisphere. MEPs were recorded using subdermal needle electrodes placed in the abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi, tibialis anterior, and abductor halluces muscles.

4. Surgical procedure

A standard frontotemporal craniotomy was performed. After exposure of the aneurysm, its neck was clipped using a downward curved clip. Subsequently, two stacked clips and a fenestrated booster clip to reinforce the closure were applied to the aneurysmal dome and distal neck, respectively. Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography showed that all of the vessels were patent and non-compressed, and the amplitude of SSEPs and MEPs remained at the control level. Approximately 15 min after clipping, during dural closure, isolated loss of the left APB MEP was observed. The surgeon reopened the dura and all clips other than the curved clip applied to the aneurysmal neck were rapidly removed, resulting in the gradual restoration of the left APB MEP. Two stacked clips were reapplied to the aneurysmal dome. ICG angiography confirmed blood flow in the adjacent arteries. Immediately after release of the brain retractor, the left APB MEP amplitude was lost again. The clips were suspected to have directly compromised blood flow by repositioning the frontal lobe and kinked the adjacent arteries after release of the brain retractor, and clip readjustment was needed. To minimize the likelihood of clip rotation, we clipped the aneurysmal neck using a curved fenestrated clip. A straight fenestrated clip and curved mini-clip were applied to the dome of the aneurysm. Furthermore, a large amount of oxidized cellulose (Surgicel®) and fibrin sealant (Tisseel®) was inserted between the frontal base and the clips. SSEPs and MEPs were maintained until the end of surgical closure. Intraoperative findings and MEP changes are shown in Fig. 2.

join-1-1-25-g2
Fig. 2. Intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) findings. The aneurysm was clipped using a curved clip, two stacked clips, and a fenestrated booster clip. The MEP remained unchanged until clip placement at the aneurysm, was lost during dural closure (approximately 15 min after clipping), and reappeared after all clips other than the curved clip applied to the aneurysmal neck had been removed. The MEP remained unchanged until the two stacked clips were repositioned and was lost after release of the brain retractor. Finally, the aneurysm was occluded using two fenestrated clips with a mini-clip. Furthermore, a large amount of oxidized cellulose (Surgicel®) and fibrin sealant (Tisseel®) was inserted between the frontal base and the clips to prevent clip rotation, after which the MEP amplitude remained unchanged until the end of surgical closure.
Download Original Figure
5. Postoperative course

Postoperative cerebral catheter angiography revealed complete obliteration of the aneurysm and no compression of the adjacent arteries (Fig. 1-B) and a computed tomography scan (performed on Postoperative Day 5) revealed no new low-density areas. The patient was discharged 1 week after surgery without any neurologic deficits.

Discussion

Cerebral aneurysms often occur in locations surrounded by adjacent neurovascular structures, such as the optic nerve, the oculomotor nerve, and the cerebral arteries and their branches. Therefore, surgical outcomes may be severely impaired by ischemic complications resulting from inadvertent vascular occlusion or compromise [1,3,4]. The possible mechanisms of blood flow insufficiency during or immediately after aneurysm clipping surgery include clipping of the nearby parent or perforating vessels, thromboembolism, vasospasm, and clip rotation caused by postoperative edema in the neighboring structures [3,4]. Studies using intraoperative modalities to assess vessel patency have demonstrated the incidence of unexpected vessel compromise to be in the range of 5%–30%, and more than 50% of these patients experience stroke [5]. This complication is reversible in intraoperative settings, and should be avoided to optimize patient outcomes [2,5].

To clip an aneurysm successfully without injuring the surrounding cerebral structures requires appropriate planning and delicate operative techniques. Although the neurosurgeon may judge that clip placement has been performed adequately, clip rotation might occur and cause strangulation of a branching artery near the aneurysm after release of brain retraction [1,3,4,6,7]. Clip rotation may occur in the period between clipping and the end of general anesthesia. Several intraoperative monitoring techniques, such as micro-Doppler ultrasound and ICG angiography, have been developed to reduce ischemic complications after aneurysm clipping[1,2]. However, no method exists to verify distal blood flow after removal of the retractor and dural closure. In our case, blood flow through the arteries, which had been verified on ICG angiography, might have been compromised after the release of brain retraction. IONM could overcome this pitfall.

We reported a case with delayed loss of MEP during cerebral aneurysm clipping surgery, in which aneurysm clip rotation after release of brain retraction might have disrupted blood flow in the branching arteries near the aneurysm. We emphasize that surgeons and IONM personnel should not only exercise caution in the clip placement itself, but also be aware of the necessity of continuing IONM until the end of surgery, because major changes may occur even during the non-key portions of surgery.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the medical laboratory technologist Byung-Hwa Park for his technical assistance.

References

1.

Park W, Ahn JS, Lee SH, Park JC, Kwun BD. Results of re-exploration because of compromised distal blood flow after clipping unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157(6):1015-24.

2.

Bacigaluppi S, Fontanella M, Manninen P, Ducati A, Tredici G, Gentili F. Monitoring techniques for prevention of procedure-related ischemic damage in aneurysm surgery. World Neurosurg. 2012;78(3-4): 276-88.

3.

Kim BM, Kim DI, Shin YS, Chung EC, Kim DJ, Suh SH, et al. Clinical outcome and ischemic complication after treatment of anterior choroidal artery aneurysm: comparison between surgical clipping and endovascular coiling. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(2): 286-90.

4.

Friedman JA, Pichelmann MA, Piepgras DG, Atkinson JL, Maher CO, Meyer FB, et al. Ischemic complications of surgery for anterior choroidal artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2001;94(4):565-72.

5.

Amin-Hanjani S, Meglio G, Gatto R, Bauer A, Charbel FT. The utility of intraoperative blood flow measurement during aneurysm surgery using an ultrasonic perivascular flow probe. Oper Neurosurg. 2006;58(4 Suppl 2):ONS- 305-12.

6.

Sakuma J, Suzuki K, Sasaki T, Matsumoto M, Oinuma M, Kawakami M, et al. Monitoring and preventing blood flow insufficiency due to clip rotation after the treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2004; 100(5):960-2.

7.

Kim JW, Seung WB. Delayed branching artery occlusion caused by clip totation after intracranial aneurysm clippings. Case Rep Neurol. 2018;10(2): 159-64.